Special Thanksgiving Edition 0.5 of PCL! Standalone PCL released!

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
17 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Special Thanksgiving Edition 0.5 of PCL! Standalone PCL released!

Geoffrey Biggs
Hi all,

For all of us who plan to spend Thanksgiving working (perhaps we enjoy
coding more than turkey, or it could just be that we don't live in the
US...), there's a brand new release of PCL. This brings it up to 0.5.
(I'm reliably informed that this makes it "half-way decent.") The
changelist is in the usual place:

http://www.ros.org/wiki/point_cloud_perception/ChangeList

In conjunction with the 0.5 release, we have just put the finishing
touches on a standalone distribution of PCL. This means that those of
you who are not using ROS can now use PCL in your applications.

Instructions and downloads for the standalone version are available here:

http://www.ros.org/wiki/pcl/standalone

It's still somewhat unrefined, and we need to work with some of the
dependencies to make installation easier. Look for many improvements as
we head towards 1.0!

Thanks again to all the contributors!

Geoff
_______________________________________________
[hidden email] / http://pcl.ros.org
https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/pcl-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [ros-users] Special Thanksgiving Edition 0.5 of PCL! Standalone PCL released!

Radu B. Rusu
Administrator
Oh, let's keep the discussions on pcl-users@ since they are PCL specific. :) Thanks!

Cheers,
Radu.


On 11/29/2010 06:44 PM, Radu Bogdan Rusu wrote:

> Jose,
>
> Thanks for your comments.
>
>
>
> On 11/29/2010 02:36 PM, Jose Gonzalez wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm a new user trying to compile standalone version 0.5. I had a
>> couple of problems so far:
>> * The eigen 3 dependency is not listed on the wiki (I'll try to use
>> eigen3.0-beta2)
>
> You're right - we forgot about that. Can you help us by editing the wiki and adding Eigen there as a dependency?
>
>> * I got a compilation error related to the ANN library. The code uses
>> different float and integer parameters instead of ANNcoord, ANNDist,
>> etc. in different function calls.. I know this dependency is a
>> candidate to be removed but I'd like to know which version could I use
>> to make pcl 0.5 to work (I'm trying the latest version I found, ANN
>> 1.1.2)
>
> Argh yes. ANN needs to be patched in order to function with PCL. What should we do here? I think we're really close to
> get rid of it, but in the meantime, should we provide a patched archive?
>
>> Thanks a lot!
>> Jose
>
>
> Cheers,
> Radu.
_______________________________________________
[hidden email] / http://pcl.ros.org
https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/pcl-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [ros-users] Special Thanksgiving Edition 0.5 of PCL! Standalone PCL released!

Jose Gonzalez
Thanks for your help, I managed to compile the standalone library...
Now time to play with it :)

Jose

On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Radu Bogdan Rusu <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Oh, let's keep the discussions on pcl-users@ since they are PCL specific. :)
> Thanks!
>
> Cheers,
> Radu.
>
>
> On 11/29/2010 06:44 PM, Radu Bogdan Rusu wrote:
>>
>> Jose,
>>
>> Thanks for your comments.
>>
>>
>>
>> On 11/29/2010 02:36 PM, Jose Gonzalez wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I'm a new user trying to compile standalone version 0.5. I had a
>>> couple of problems so far:
>>> * The eigen 3 dependency is not listed on the wiki (I'll try to use
>>> eigen3.0-beta2)
>>
>> You're right - we forgot about that. Can you help us by editing the wiki
>> and adding Eigen there as a dependency?
>>
>>> * I got a compilation error related to the ANN library. The code uses
>>> different float and integer parameters instead of ANNcoord, ANNDist,
>>> etc. in different function calls.. I know this dependency is a
>>> candidate to be removed but I'd like to know which version could I use
>>> to make pcl 0.5 to work (I'm trying the latest version I found, ANN
>>> 1.1.2)
>>
>> Argh yes. ANN needs to be patched in order to function with PCL. What
>> should we do here? I think we're really close to
>> get rid of it, but in the meantime, should we provide a patched archive?
>>
>>> Thanks a lot!
>>> Jose
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Radu.
>
_______________________________________________
[hidden email] / http://pcl.ros.org
https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/pcl-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [ros-users] Special Thanksgiving Edition 0.5 of PCL! Standalone PCL released!

Jose Gonzalez
One thing I just realized is that there are no install clauses in the
CMake building scripts (so 'make install' won't work as indicated in
the wiki). I just manually copied the headers and libraries to system
dirs but I was wondering which are the final plans.

I found that there is a declaration header (.hpp) per almost every
definition file (.h). Are the plans to store them in the same target
dirs? Is there any simple task I could do to assist in completing the
standalone version?

Sorry if these questions are too basic or were previously addressed
but I'm new to PCL (as I mentioned in my first mail). Feel free to
point me to previous mails if that is the case.

Thanks again,
Jose


On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Jose Gonzalez <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Thanks for your help, I managed to compile the standalone library...
> Now time to play with it :)
>
> Jose
>
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Radu Bogdan Rusu <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> Oh, let's keep the discussions on pcl-users@ since they are PCL specific. :)
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Radu.
>>
>>
>> On 11/29/2010 06:44 PM, Radu Bogdan Rusu wrote:
>>>
>>> Jose,
>>>
>>> Thanks for your comments.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11/29/2010 02:36 PM, Jose Gonzalez wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I'm a new user trying to compile standalone version 0.5. I had a
>>>> couple of problems so far:
>>>> * The eigen 3 dependency is not listed on the wiki (I'll try to use
>>>> eigen3.0-beta2)
>>>
>>> You're right - we forgot about that. Can you help us by editing the wiki
>>> and adding Eigen there as a dependency?
>>>
>>>> * I got a compilation error related to the ANN library. The code uses
>>>> different float and integer parameters instead of ANNcoord, ANNDist,
>>>> etc. in different function calls.. I know this dependency is a
>>>> candidate to be removed but I'd like to know which version could I use
>>>> to make pcl 0.5 to work (I'm trying the latest version I found, ANN
>>>> 1.1.2)
>>>
>>> Argh yes. ANN needs to be patched in order to function with PCL. What
>>> should we do here? I think we're really close to
>>> get rid of it, but in the meantime, should we provide a patched archive?
>>>
>>>> Thanks a lot!
>>>> Jose
>>>
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Radu.
>>
>
_______________________________________________
[hidden email] / http://pcl.ros.org
https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/pcl-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [ros-users] Special Thanksgiving Edition 0.5 of PCL! Standalone PCL released!

Geoffrey Biggs
On 01/12/10 05:06, Jose Gonzalez wrote:
> One thing I just realized is that there are no install clauses in the
> CMake building scripts (so 'make install' won't work as indicated in
> the wiki). I just manually copied the headers and libraries to system
> dirs but I was wondering which are the final plans.

This is a good point. In our mad rush to use the existing ROS-based
Makefile, we forgot that ROS doesn't really "install" stuff in the
traditional sense. Whoops.

> I found that there is a declaration header (.hpp) per almost every
> definition file (.h). Are the plans to store them in the same target

The .hpp files should really go into include/ along with the .h files,
as they are technically headers.

> dirs? Is there any simple task I could do to assist in completing the
> standalone version?

If you want to help out, the first place to start is to identify a list
of files that will need to be installed and where they need to go (e.g.
if they need to be in certain subdirectories below include/pcl/).


> Sorry if these questions are too basic or were previously addressed
> but I'm new to PCL (as I mentioned in my first mail). Feel free to
> point me to previous mails if that is the case.

So long as you're not asking "how do I compile a C file?" you're not
asking something too basic for the PCL list. :)

Geoff


> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Jose Gonzalez <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> Thanks for your help, I managed to compile the standalone library...
>> Now time to play with it :)
>>
>> Jose
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Radu Bogdan Rusu <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>> Oh, let's keep the discussions on pcl-users@ since they are PCL specific. :)
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Radu.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11/29/2010 06:44 PM, Radu Bogdan Rusu wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Jose,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for your comments.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 11/29/2010 02:36 PM, Jose Gonzalez wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm a new user trying to compile standalone version 0.5. I had a
>>>>> couple of problems so far:
>>>>> * The eigen 3 dependency is not listed on the wiki (I'll try to use
>>>>> eigen3.0-beta2)
>>>>
>>>> You're right - we forgot about that. Can you help us by editing the wiki
>>>> and adding Eigen there as a dependency?
>>>>
>>>>> * I got a compilation error related to the ANN library. The code uses
>>>>> different float and integer parameters instead of ANNcoord, ANNDist,
>>>>> etc. in different function calls.. I know this dependency is a
>>>>> candidate to be removed but I'd like to know which version could I use
>>>>> to make pcl 0.5 to work (I'm trying the latest version I found, ANN
>>>>> 1.1.2)
>>>>
>>>> Argh yes. ANN needs to be patched in order to function with PCL. What
>>>> should we do here? I think we're really close to
>>>> get rid of it, but in the meantime, should we provide a patched archive?
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks a lot!
>>>>> Jose
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Radu.
>>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> [hidden email] / http://pcl.ros.org
> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/pcl-users
_______________________________________________
[hidden email] / http://pcl.ros.org
https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/pcl-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [ros-users] Special Thanksgiving Edition 0.5 of PCL! Standalone PCL released!

Jose Gonzalez
Is the standalone version hosted in a repository? That way I could add
the install clauses in the CMakeLists.txt and send a patch synced with
head. I'm also trying to make the tests to compile, only few of them
are not working

Thanks
Jose



On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 12:52 AM, Geoffrey Biggs
<[hidden email]> wrote:

> On 01/12/10 05:06, Jose Gonzalez wrote:
>> One thing I just realized is that there are no install clauses in the
>> CMake building scripts (so 'make install' won't work as indicated in
>> the wiki). I just manually copied the headers and libraries to system
>> dirs but I was wondering which are the final plans.
>
> This is a good point. In our mad rush to use the existing ROS-based
> Makefile, we forgot that ROS doesn't really "install" stuff in the
> traditional sense. Whoops.
>
>> I found that there is a declaration header (.hpp) per almost every
>> definition file (.h). Are the plans to store them in the same target
>
> The .hpp files should really go into include/ along with the .h files,
> as they are technically headers.
>
>> dirs? Is there any simple task I could do to assist in completing the
>> standalone version?
>
> If you want to help out, the first place to start is to identify a list
> of files that will need to be installed and where they need to go (e.g.
> if they need to be in certain subdirectories below include/pcl/).
>
>
>> Sorry if these questions are too basic or were previously addressed
>> but I'm new to PCL (as I mentioned in my first mail). Feel free to
>> point me to previous mails if that is the case.
>
> So long as you're not asking "how do I compile a C file?" you're not
> asking something too basic for the PCL list. :)
>
> Geoff
>
>
>> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Jose Gonzalez <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>> Thanks for your help, I managed to compile the standalone library...
>>> Now time to play with it :)
>>>
>>> Jose
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Radu Bogdan Rusu <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>> Oh, let's keep the discussions on pcl-users@ since they are PCL specific. :)
>>>> Thanks!
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Radu.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 11/29/2010 06:44 PM, Radu Bogdan Rusu wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Jose,
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for your comments.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 11/29/2010 02:36 PM, Jose Gonzalez wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm a new user trying to compile standalone version 0.5. I had a
>>>>>> couple of problems so far:
>>>>>> * The eigen 3 dependency is not listed on the wiki (I'll try to use
>>>>>> eigen3.0-beta2)
>>>>>
>>>>> You're right - we forgot about that. Can you help us by editing the wiki
>>>>> and adding Eigen there as a dependency?
>>>>>
>>>>>> * I got a compilation error related to the ANN library. The code uses
>>>>>> different float and integer parameters instead of ANNcoord, ANNDist,
>>>>>> etc. in different function calls.. I know this dependency is a
>>>>>> candidate to be removed but I'd like to know which version could I use
>>>>>> to make pcl 0.5 to work (I'm trying the latest version I found, ANN
>>>>>> 1.1.2)
>>>>>
>>>>> Argh yes. ANN needs to be patched in order to function with PCL. What
>>>>> should we do here? I think we're really close to
>>>>> get rid of it, but in the meantime, should we provide a patched archive?
>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks a lot!
>>>>>> Jose
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Radu.
>>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> [hidden email] / http://pcl.ros.org
>> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/pcl-users
> _______________________________________________
> [hidden email] / http://pcl.ros.org
> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/pcl-users
>
_______________________________________________
[hidden email] / http://pcl.ros.org
https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/pcl-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [ros-users] Special Thanksgiving Edition 0.5 of PCL! Standalone PCL released!

Radu B. Rusu
Administrator
Hmmm... not at the moment. I suppose the easiest way right now is to send us a patch. Geoff's probably _the man_ for
integrating it right now :)

Maybe we should try to get some repository space to host the standalone version too -- but then we're afraid of
diverging from trunk (which is still hosted inside ROS).

It really is an unique way of doing things... :) keeping the PCL trunk inside ROS, and then exporting it for the outside
world. 100% of the other libraries we use have a reverse model, where the trunk is outside ROS and we build metapackages
for them to bring them inside.

Cheers,
Radu.


On 12/01/2010 06:43 AM, Jose Gonzalez wrote:

> Is the standalone version hosted in a repository? That way I could add
> the install clauses in the CMakeLists.txt and send a patch synced with
> head. I'm also trying to make the tests to compile, only few of them
> are not working
>
> Thanks
> Jose
>
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 12:52 AM, Geoffrey Biggs
> <[hidden email]>  wrote:
>> On 01/12/10 05:06, Jose Gonzalez wrote:
>>> One thing I just realized is that there are no install clauses in the
>>> CMake building scripts (so 'make install' won't work as indicated in
>>> the wiki). I just manually copied the headers and libraries to system
>>> dirs but I was wondering which are the final plans.
>>
>> This is a good point. In our mad rush to use the existing ROS-based
>> Makefile, we forgot that ROS doesn't really "install" stuff in the
>> traditional sense. Whoops.
>>
>>> I found that there is a declaration header (.hpp) per almost every
>>> definition file (.h). Are the plans to store them in the same target
>>
>> The .hpp files should really go into include/ along with the .h files,
>> as they are technically headers.
>>
>>> dirs? Is there any simple task I could do to assist in completing the
>>> standalone version?
>>
>> If you want to help out, the first place to start is to identify a list
>> of files that will need to be installed and where they need to go (e.g.
>> if they need to be in certain subdirectories below include/pcl/).
>>
>>
>>> Sorry if these questions are too basic or were previously addressed
>>> but I'm new to PCL (as I mentioned in my first mail). Feel free to
>>> point me to previous mails if that is the case.
>>
>> So long as you're not asking "how do I compile a C file?" you're not
>> asking something too basic for the PCL list. :)
>>
>> Geoff
>>
>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Jose Gonzalez<[hidden email]>  wrote:
>>>> Thanks for your help, I managed to compile the standalone library...
>>>> Now time to play with it :)
>>>>
>>>> Jose
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Radu Bogdan Rusu<[hidden email]>  wrote:
>>>>> Oh, let's keep the discussions on pcl-users@ since they are PCL specific. :)
>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Radu.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 11/29/2010 06:44 PM, Radu Bogdan Rusu wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jose,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks for your comments.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 11/29/2010 02:36 PM, Jose Gonzalez wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm a new user trying to compile standalone version 0.5. I had a
>>>>>>> couple of problems so far:
>>>>>>> * The eigen 3 dependency is not listed on the wiki (I'll try to use
>>>>>>> eigen3.0-beta2)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You're right - we forgot about that. Can you help us by editing the wiki
>>>>>> and adding Eigen there as a dependency?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> * I got a compilation error related to the ANN library. The code uses
>>>>>>> different float and integer parameters instead of ANNcoord, ANNDist,
>>>>>>> etc. in different function calls.. I know this dependency is a
>>>>>>> candidate to be removed but I'd like to know which version could I use
>>>>>>> to make pcl 0.5 to work (I'm trying the latest version I found, ANN
>>>>>>> 1.1.2)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Argh yes. ANN needs to be patched in order to function with PCL. What
>>>>>> should we do here? I think we're really close to
>>>>>> get rid of it, but in the meantime, should we provide a patched archive?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks a lot!
>>>>>>> Jose
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> Radu.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> [hidden email] / http://pcl.ros.org
>>> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/pcl-users
>> _______________________________________________
>> [hidden email] / http://pcl.ros.org
>> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/pcl-users
>>
> _______________________________________________
> [hidden email] / http://pcl.ros.org
> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/pcl-users
_______________________________________________
[hidden email] / http://pcl.ros.org
https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/pcl-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [ros-users] Special Thanksgiving Edition 0.5 of PCL! Standalone PCL released!

Jose Gonzalez
Here you have a patch against pcl 0.6.0 (standalone version) modifying CMakeLists.txt to include the install commands. I'll send another one as soon as I get the tests working.

Thanks (and happy birthday to Bastian!)
Jose

On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 12:01 PM, Radu Bogdan Rusu <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hmmm... not at the moment. I suppose the easiest way right now is to send us a patch. Geoff's probably _the man_ for integrating it right now :)

Maybe we should try to get some repository space to host the standalone version too -- but then we're afraid of diverging from trunk (which is still hosted inside ROS).

It really is an unique way of doing things... :) keeping the PCL trunk inside ROS, and then exporting it for the outside world. 100% of the other libraries we use have a reverse model, where the trunk is outside ROS and we build metapackages for them to bring them inside.

Cheers,
Radu.



On 12/01/2010 06:43 AM, Jose Gonzalez wrote:
Is the standalone version hosted in a repository? That way I could add
the install clauses in the CMakeLists.txt and send a patch synced with
head. I'm also trying to make the tests to compile, only few of them
are not working

Thanks
Jose



On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 12:52 AM, Geoffrey Biggs
<[hidden email]>  wrote:
On 01/12/10 05:06, Jose Gonzalez wrote:
One thing I just realized is that there are no install clauses in the
CMake building scripts (so 'make install' won't work as indicated in
the wiki). I just manually copied the headers and libraries to system
dirs but I was wondering which are the final plans.

This is a good point. In our mad rush to use the existing ROS-based
Makefile, we forgot that ROS doesn't really "install" stuff in the
traditional sense. Whoops.

I found that there is a declaration header (.hpp) per almost every
definition file (.h). Are the plans to store them in the same target

The .hpp files should really go into include/ along with the .h files,
as they are technically headers.

dirs? Is there any simple task I could do to assist in completing the
standalone version?

If you want to help out, the first place to start is to identify a list
of files that will need to be installed and where they need to go (e.g.
if they need to be in certain subdirectories below include/pcl/).


Sorry if these questions are too basic or were previously addressed
but I'm new to PCL (as I mentioned in my first mail). Feel free to
point me to previous mails if that is the case.

So long as you're not asking "how do I compile a C file?" you're not
asking something too basic for the PCL list. :)

Geoff


On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Jose Gonzalez<[hidden email]>  wrote:
Thanks for your help, I managed to compile the standalone library...
Now time to play with it :)

Jose

On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Radu Bogdan Rusu<[hidden email]>  wrote:
Oh, let's keep the discussions on pcl-users@ since they are PCL specific. :)
Thanks!

Cheers,
Radu.


On 11/29/2010 06:44 PM, Radu Bogdan Rusu wrote:

Jose,

Thanks for your comments.



On 11/29/2010 02:36 PM, Jose Gonzalez wrote:

Hi all,

I'm a new user trying to compile standalone version 0.5. I had a
couple of problems so far:
* The eigen 3 dependency is not listed on the wiki (I'll try to use
eigen3.0-beta2)

You're right - we forgot about that. Can you help us by editing the wiki
and adding Eigen there as a dependency?

* I got a compilation error related to the ANN library. The code uses
different float and integer parameters instead of ANNcoord, ANNDist,
etc. in different function calls.. I know this dependency is a
candidate to be removed but I'd like to know which version could I use
to make pcl 0.5 to work (I'm trying the latest version I found, ANN
1.1.2)

Argh yes. ANN needs to be patched in order to function with PCL. What
should we do here? I think we're really close to
get rid of it, but in the meantime, should we provide a patched archive?

Thanks a lot!
Jose


Cheers,
Radu.


_______________________________________________
[hidden email] / http://pcl.ros.org
https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/pcl-users
_______________________________________________
[hidden email] / http://pcl.ros.org
https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/pcl-users

_______________________________________________
[hidden email] / http://pcl.ros.org
https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/pcl-users


_______________________________________________
[hidden email] / http://pcl.ros.org
https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/pcl-users

patchPCLCMakeInstalls.patch (13K) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [ros-users] Special Thanksgiving Edition 0.5 of PCL! Standalone PCL released!

Radu B. Rusu
Administrator
Jose,

Thanks a lot for the patch. Btw, shouldn't the new lines be marked
with + and not -? I think the patch is inverted :)

In any case, Geoff will probably look at it and integrate it later.

Cheers,
Radu.

On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 12:34 PM, Jose Gonzalez <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Here you have a patch against pcl 0.6.0 (standalone version)
> modifying CMakeLists.txt to include the install commands. I'll send another
> one as soon as I get the tests working.
> Thanks (and happy birthday to Bastian!)
> Jose
> On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 12:01 PM, Radu Bogdan Rusu <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hmmm... not at the moment. I suppose the easiest way right now is to send
>> us a patch. Geoff's probably _the man_ for integrating it right now :)
>>
>> Maybe we should try to get some repository space to host the standalone
>> version too -- but then we're afraid of diverging from trunk (which is still
>> hosted inside ROS).
>>
>> It really is an unique way of doing things... :) keeping the PCL trunk
>> inside ROS, and then exporting it for the outside world. 100% of the other
>> libraries we use have a reverse model, where the trunk is outside ROS and we
>> build metapackages for them to bring them inside.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Radu.
>>
>>
>> On 12/01/2010 06:43 AM, Jose Gonzalez wrote:
>>>
>>> Is the standalone version hosted in a repository? That way I could add
>>> the install clauses in the CMakeLists.txt and send a patch synced with
>>> head. I'm also trying to make the tests to compile, only few of them
>>> are not working
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Jose
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 12:52 AM, Geoffrey Biggs
>>> <[hidden email]>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 01/12/10 05:06, Jose Gonzalez wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> One thing I just realized is that there are no install clauses in the
>>>>> CMake building scripts (so 'make install' won't work as indicated in
>>>>> the wiki). I just manually copied the headers and libraries to system
>>>>> dirs but I was wondering which are the final plans.
>>>>
>>>> This is a good point. In our mad rush to use the existing ROS-based
>>>> Makefile, we forgot that ROS doesn't really "install" stuff in the
>>>> traditional sense. Whoops.
>>>>
>>>>> I found that there is a declaration header (.hpp) per almost every
>>>>> definition file (.h). Are the plans to store them in the same target
>>>>
>>>> The .hpp files should really go into include/ along with the .h files,
>>>> as they are technically headers.
>>>>
>>>>> dirs? Is there any simple task I could do to assist in completing the
>>>>> standalone version?
>>>>
>>>> If you want to help out, the first place to start is to identify a list
>>>> of files that will need to be installed and where they need to go (e.g.
>>>> if they need to be in certain subdirectories below include/pcl/).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Sorry if these questions are too basic or were previously addressed
>>>>> but I'm new to PCL (as I mentioned in my first mail). Feel free to
>>>>> point me to previous mails if that is the case.
>>>>
>>>> So long as you're not asking "how do I compile a C file?" you're not
>>>> asking something too basic for the PCL list. :)
>>>>
>>>> Geoff
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Jose Gonzalez<[hidden email]>
>>>>>  wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks for your help, I managed to compile the standalone library...
>>>>>> Now time to play with it :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jose
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Radu Bogdan
>>>>>> Rusu<[hidden email]>  wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Oh, let's keep the discussions on pcl-users@ since they are PCL
>>>>>>> specific. :)
>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>> Radu.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 11/29/2010 06:44 PM, Radu Bogdan Rusu wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Jose,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks for your comments.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 11/29/2010 02:36 PM, Jose Gonzalez wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm a new user trying to compile standalone version 0.5. I had a
>>>>>>>>> couple of problems so far:
>>>>>>>>> * The eigen 3 dependency is not listed on the wiki (I'll try to use
>>>>>>>>> eigen3.0-beta2)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You're right - we forgot about that. Can you help us by editing the
>>>>>>>> wiki
>>>>>>>> and adding Eigen there as a dependency?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> * I got a compilation error related to the ANN library. The code
>>>>>>>>> uses
>>>>>>>>> different float and integer parameters instead of ANNcoord,
>>>>>>>>> ANNDist,
>>>>>>>>> etc. in different function calls.. I know this dependency is a
>>>>>>>>> candidate to be removed but I'd like to know which version could I
>>>>>>>>> use
>>>>>>>>> to make pcl 0.5 to work (I'm trying the latest version I found, ANN
>>>>>>>>> 1.1.2)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Argh yes. ANN needs to be patched in order to function with PCL.
>>>>>>>> What
>>>>>>>> should we do here? I think we're really close to
>>>>>>>> get rid of it, but in the meantime, should we provide a patched
>>>>>>>> archive?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks a lot!
>>>>>>>>> Jose
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>> Radu.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> [hidden email] / http://pcl.ros.org
>>>>> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/pcl-users
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> [hidden email] / http://pcl.ros.org
>>>> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/pcl-users
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> [hidden email] / http://pcl.ros.org
>>> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/pcl-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> [hidden email] / http://pcl.ros.org
> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/pcl-users
>
>
_______________________________________________
[hidden email] / http://pcl.ros.org
https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/pcl-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [ros-users] Special Thanksgiving Edition 0.5 of PCL! Standalone PCL released!

Jose Gonzalez
Oopps... forward patch included this time :)

On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Radu Bogdan Rusu <[hidden email]> wrote:
Jose,

Thanks a lot for the patch. Btw, shouldn't the new lines be marked
with + and not -? I think the patch is inverted :)

In any case, Geoff will probably look at it and integrate it later.

Cheers,
Radu.

On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 12:34 PM, Jose Gonzalez <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Here you have a patch against pcl 0.6.0 (standalone version)
> modifying CMakeLists.txt to include the install commands. I'll send another
> one as soon as I get the tests working.
> Thanks (and happy birthday to Bastian!)
> Jose
> On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 12:01 PM, Radu Bogdan Rusu <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hmmm... not at the moment. I suppose the easiest way right now is to send
>> us a patch. Geoff's probably _the man_ for integrating it right now :)
>>
>> Maybe we should try to get some repository space to host the standalone
>> version too -- but then we're afraid of diverging from trunk (which is still
>> hosted inside ROS).
>>
>> It really is an unique way of doing things... :) keeping the PCL trunk
>> inside ROS, and then exporting it for the outside world. 100% of the other
>> libraries we use have a reverse model, where the trunk is outside ROS and we
>> build metapackages for them to bring them inside.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Radu.
>>
>>
>> On 12/01/2010 06:43 AM, Jose Gonzalez wrote:
>>>
>>> Is the standalone version hosted in a repository? That way I could add
>>> the install clauses in the CMakeLists.txt and send a patch synced with
>>> head. I'm also trying to make the tests to compile, only few of them
>>> are not working
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Jose
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 12:52 AM, Geoffrey Biggs
>>> <[hidden email]>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 01/12/10 05:06, Jose Gonzalez wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> One thing I just realized is that there are no install clauses in the
>>>>> CMake building scripts (so 'make install' won't work as indicated in
>>>>> the wiki). I just manually copied the headers and libraries to system
>>>>> dirs but I was wondering which are the final plans.
>>>>
>>>> This is a good point. In our mad rush to use the existing ROS-based
>>>> Makefile, we forgot that ROS doesn't really "install" stuff in the
>>>> traditional sense. Whoops.
>>>>
>>>>> I found that there is a declaration header (.hpp) per almost every
>>>>> definition file (.h). Are the plans to store them in the same target
>>>>
>>>> The .hpp files should really go into include/ along with the .h files,
>>>> as they are technically headers.
>>>>
>>>>> dirs? Is there any simple task I could do to assist in completing the
>>>>> standalone version?
>>>>
>>>> If you want to help out, the first place to start is to identify a list
>>>> of files that will need to be installed and where they need to go (e.g.
>>>> if they need to be in certain subdirectories below include/pcl/).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Sorry if these questions are too basic or were previously addressed
>>>>> but I'm new to PCL (as I mentioned in my first mail). Feel free to
>>>>> point me to previous mails if that is the case.
>>>>
>>>> So long as you're not asking "how do I compile a C file?" you're not
>>>> asking something too basic for the PCL list. :)
>>>>
>>>> Geoff
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Jose Gonzalez<[hidden email]>
>>>>>  wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks for your help, I managed to compile the standalone library...
>>>>>> Now time to play with it :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jose
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Radu Bogdan
>>>>>> Rusu<[hidden email]>  wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Oh, let's keep the discussions on pcl-users@ since they are PCL
>>>>>>> specific. :)
>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>> Radu.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 11/29/2010 06:44 PM, Radu Bogdan Rusu wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Jose,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks for your comments.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 11/29/2010 02:36 PM, Jose Gonzalez wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm a new user trying to compile standalone version 0.5. I had a
>>>>>>>>> couple of problems so far:
>>>>>>>>> * The eigen 3 dependency is not listed on the wiki (I'll try to use
>>>>>>>>> eigen3.0-beta2)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You're right - we forgot about that. Can you help us by editing the
>>>>>>>> wiki
>>>>>>>> and adding Eigen there as a dependency?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> * I got a compilation error related to the ANN library. The code
>>>>>>>>> uses
>>>>>>>>> different float and integer parameters instead of ANNcoord,
>>>>>>>>> ANNDist,
>>>>>>>>> etc. in different function calls.. I know this dependency is a
>>>>>>>>> candidate to be removed but I'd like to know which version could I
>>>>>>>>> use
>>>>>>>>> to make pcl 0.5 to work (I'm trying the latest version I found, ANN
>>>>>>>>> 1.1.2)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Argh yes. ANN needs to be patched in order to function with PCL.
>>>>>>>> What
>>>>>>>> should we do here? I think we're really close to
>>>>>>>> get rid of it, but in the meantime, should we provide a patched
>>>>>>>> archive?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks a lot!
>>>>>>>>> Jose
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>> Radu.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> [hidden email] / http://pcl.ros.org
>>>>> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/pcl-users
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> [hidden email] / http://pcl.ros.org
>>>> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/pcl-users
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> [hidden email] / http://pcl.ros.org
>>> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/pcl-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> [hidden email] / http://pcl.ros.org
> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/pcl-users
>
>
_______________________________________________
[hidden email] / http://pcl.ros.org
https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/pcl-users


_______________________________________________
[hidden email] / http://pointclouds.org
https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/pcl-users

patchPCLCMakeInstalls2.patch (13K) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [ros-users] Special Thanksgiving Edition 0.5 of PCL! Standalone PCL released!

Radu B. Rusu
Administrator
Jose,

Would it be ok if I ask you to regenerate the patch in a few hours (I'll ping you when we're done) ? :)

Troy proposed an internal cleanup of the library which might lead to _large_ speedups in compilation time, so the patch
would need to be changed quite a bit afterwards. We're testing this today. Fingers crossed.. if this works, we just
might be able to compile PCL on the Gumstix afterwards :)

Btw, these changes are only internal, no user should really notice them.

Cheers,
Radu.


On 12/02/2010 12:59 PM, Jose Gonzalez wrote:

> Oopps... forward patch included this time :)
>
> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Radu Bogdan Rusu <[hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
>
>     Jose,
>
>     Thanks a lot for the patch. Btw, shouldn't the new lines be marked
>     with + and not -? I think the patch is inverted :)
>
>     In any case, Geoff will probably look at it and integrate it later.
>
>     Cheers,
>     Radu.
>
>     On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 12:34 PM, Jose Gonzalez <[hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
>      > Here you have a patch against pcl 0.6.0 (standalone version)
>      > modifying CMakeLists.txt to include the install commands. I'll send another
>      > one as soon as I get the tests working.
>      > Thanks (and happy birthday to Bastian!)
>      > Jose
>      > On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 12:01 PM, Radu Bogdan Rusu <[hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>>
>      > wrote:
>      >>
>      >> Hmmm... not at the moment. I suppose the easiest way right now is to send
>      >> us a patch. Geoff's probably _the man_ for integrating it right now :)
>      >>
>      >> Maybe we should try to get some repository space to host the standalone
>      >> version too -- but then we're afraid of diverging from trunk (which is still
>      >> hosted inside ROS).
>      >>
>      >> It really is an unique way of doing things... :) keeping the PCL trunk
>      >> inside ROS, and then exporting it for the outside world. 100% of the other
>      >> libraries we use have a reverse model, where the trunk is outside ROS and we
>      >> build metapackages for them to bring them inside.
>      >>
>      >> Cheers,
>      >> Radu.
>      >>
>      >>
>      >> On 12/01/2010 06:43 AM, Jose Gonzalez wrote:
>      >>>
>      >>> Is the standalone version hosted in a repository? That way I could add
>      >>> the install clauses in the CMakeLists.txt and send a patch synced with
>      >>> head. I'm also trying to make the tests to compile, only few of them
>      >>> are not working
>      >>>
>      >>> Thanks
>      >>> Jose
>      >>>
>      >>>
>      >>>
>      >>> On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 12:52 AM, Geoffrey Biggs
>      >>> <[hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>>  wrote:
>      >>>>
>      >>>> On 01/12/10 05:06, Jose Gonzalez wrote:
>      >>>>>
>      >>>>> One thing I just realized is that there are no install clauses in the
>      >>>>> CMake building scripts (so 'make install' won't work as indicated in
>      >>>>> the wiki). I just manually copied the headers and libraries to system
>      >>>>> dirs but I was wondering which are the final plans.
>      >>>>
>      >>>> This is a good point. In our mad rush to use the existing ROS-based
>      >>>> Makefile, we forgot that ROS doesn't really "install" stuff in the
>      >>>> traditional sense. Whoops.
>      >>>>
>      >>>>> I found that there is a declaration header (.hpp) per almost every
>      >>>>> definition file (.h). Are the plans to store them in the same target
>      >>>>
>      >>>> The .hpp files should really go into include/ along with the .h files,
>      >>>> as they are technically headers.
>      >>>>
>      >>>>> dirs? Is there any simple task I could do to assist in completing the
>      >>>>> standalone version?
>      >>>>
>      >>>> If you want to help out, the first place to start is to identify a list
>      >>>> of files that will need to be installed and where they need to go (e.g.
>      >>>> if they need to be in certain subdirectories below include/pcl/).
>      >>>>
>      >>>>
>      >>>>> Sorry if these questions are too basic or were previously addressed
>      >>>>> but I'm new to PCL (as I mentioned in my first mail). Feel free to
>      >>>>> point me to previous mails if that is the case.
>      >>>>
>      >>>> So long as you're not asking "how do I compile a C file?" you're not
>      >>>> asking something too basic for the PCL list. :)
>      >>>>
>      >>>> Geoff
>      >>>>
>      >>>>
>      >>>>> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Jose Gonzalez<[hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>>
>      >>>>>  wrote:
>      >>>>>>
>      >>>>>> Thanks for your help, I managed to compile the standalone library...
>      >>>>>> Now time to play with it :)
>      >>>>>>
>      >>>>>> Jose
>      >>>>>>
>      >>>>>> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Radu Bogdan
>      >>>>>> Rusu<[hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>>  wrote:
>      >>>>>>>
>      >>>>>>> Oh, let's keep the discussions on pcl-users@ since they are PCL
>      >>>>>>> specific. :)
>      >>>>>>> Thanks!
>      >>>>>>>
>      >>>>>>> Cheers,
>      >>>>>>> Radu.
>      >>>>>>>
>      >>>>>>>
>      >>>>>>> On 11/29/2010 06:44 PM, Radu Bogdan Rusu wrote:
>      >>>>>>>>
>      >>>>>>>> Jose,
>      >>>>>>>>
>      >>>>>>>> Thanks for your comments.
>      >>>>>>>>
>      >>>>>>>>
>      >>>>>>>>
>      >>>>>>>> On 11/29/2010 02:36 PM, Jose Gonzalez wrote:
>      >>>>>>>>>
>      >>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>      >>>>>>>>>
>      >>>>>>>>> I'm a new user trying to compile standalone version 0.5. I had a
>      >>>>>>>>> couple of problems so far:
>      >>>>>>>>> * The eigen 3 dependency is not listed on the wiki (I'll try to use
>      >>>>>>>>> eigen3.0-beta2)
>      >>>>>>>>
>      >>>>>>>> You're right - we forgot about that. Can you help us by editing the
>      >>>>>>>> wiki
>      >>>>>>>> and adding Eigen there as a dependency?
>      >>>>>>>>
>      >>>>>>>>> * I got a compilation error related to the ANN library. The code
>      >>>>>>>>> uses
>      >>>>>>>>> different float and integer parameters instead of ANNcoord,
>      >>>>>>>>> ANNDist,
>      >>>>>>>>> etc. in different function calls.. I know this dependency is a
>      >>>>>>>>> candidate to be removed but I'd like to know which version could I
>      >>>>>>>>> use
>      >>>>>>>>> to make pcl 0.5 to work (I'm trying the latest version I found, ANN
>      >>>>>>>>> 1.1.2)
>      >>>>>>>>
>      >>>>>>>> Argh yes. ANN needs to be patched in order to function with PCL.
>      >>>>>>>> What
>      >>>>>>>> should we do here? I think we're really close to
>      >>>>>>>> get rid of it, but in the meantime, should we provide a patched
>      >>>>>>>> archive?
>      >>>>>>>>
>      >>>>>>>>> Thanks a lot!
>      >>>>>>>>> Jose
>      >>>>>>>>
>      >>>>>>>>
>      >>>>>>>> Cheers,
>      >>>>>>>> Radu.
>      >>>>>>>
>      >>>>>>
>      >>>>> _______________________________________________
>      >>>>> [hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]> / http://pcl.ros.org
>      >>>>> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/pcl-users
>      >>>>
>      >>>> _______________________________________________
>      >>>> [hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]> / http://pcl.ros.org
>      >>>> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/pcl-users
>      >>>>
>      >>> _______________________________________________
>      >>> [hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]> / http://pcl.ros.org
>      >>> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/pcl-users
>      >
>      >
>      > _______________________________________________
>      > [hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]> / http://pcl.ros.org
>      > https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/pcl-users
>      >
>      >
>     _______________________________________________
>     [hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]> / http://pcl.ros.org
>     https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/pcl-users
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> [hidden email] / http://pointclouds.org
> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/pcl-users
_______________________________________________
[hidden email] / http://pointclouds.org
https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/pcl-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [ros-users] Special Thanksgiving Edition 0.5 of PCL! Standalone PCL released!

Jose Gonzalez

Yes, absolutely. Just let me know when the changes are in place

Jose

On Dec 3, 2010 1:40 PM, "Radu Bogdan Rusu" <[hidden email]> wrote:

Jose,

Would it be ok if I ask you to regenerate the patch in a few hours (I'll ping you when we're done) ? :)

Troy proposed an internal cleanup of the library which might lead to _large_ speedups in compilation time, so the patch would need to be changed quite a bit afterwards. We're testing this today. Fingers crossed.. if this works, we just might be able to compile PCL on the Gumstix afterwards :)

Btw, these changes are only internal, no user should really notice them.

Cheers,
Radu.




On 12/02/2010 12:59 PM, Jose Gonzalez wrote:

>
> Oopps... forward patch included this time :)


>

> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Radu Bogdan Rusu <[hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]...

>    On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 12:34 PM, Jose Gonzalez <[hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>> w...

    > On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 12:01 PM, Radu Bogdan Rusu <[hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>>


>     > wrote:
>     >>
>     >> Hmmm... not at the moment. I suppose the easiest way right now is ...

    >>> <[hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>>  wrote:


>     >>>>
>     >>>> On 01/12/10 05:06, Jose Gonzalez wrote:
>     >>>>>
>     >>>>> One thing I j...

    >>>>> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Jose Gonzalez<[hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>>


>     >>>>>  wrote:
>     >>>>>>
>     >>>>>> Thanks for your help, I managed to compile the standa...

    >>>>>> Rusu<[hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>>  wrote:


>     >>>>>>>
>     >>>>>>> Oh, let's keep the discussions on pcl-users@ since they are PCL
>     >...

    >>>>> [hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]> / http://pcl.ros.org


>     >>>>> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/pcl-users
>     >>>>
>     >>>> _________________...

    >>>> [hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]> / http://pcl.ros.org


>     >>>> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/pcl-users
>     >>>>
>     >>> ___________________...

    >>> [hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]> / http://pcl.ros.org


>     >>> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/pcl-users
>     >
>     >
>     > _________________...

    > [hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]> / http://pcl.ros.org


>     > https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/pcl-users
>     >
>     >
>    ______________________...

   [hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]> / http://pcl.ros.org


>    https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/pcl-users
>
>
>
>
> ____________________________________...

[hidden email] / http://pointclouds.org


> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/pcl-users

_______________________________________________
[hidden email] / http://pointclouds.org
https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/pcl-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [ros-users] Special Thanksgiving Edition 0.5 of PCL! Standalone PCL released!

Geoffrey Biggs
On 04/12/10 03:43, Jose Gonzalez wrote:
> Yes, absolutely. Just let me know when the changes are in place

What's the status on this patch? Should I go ahead and apply it, or are
we waiting for an updated version?

Geoff

>> On Dec 3, 2010 1:40 PM, "Radu Bogdan Rusu" <[hidden email]
>> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
>>
>> Jose,
>>
>> Would it be ok if I ask you to regenerate the patch in a few hours
>> (I'll ping you when we're done) ? :)
>>
>> Troy proposed an internal cleanup of the library which might lead to
>> _large_ speedups in compilation time, so the patch would need to be
>> changed quite a bit afterwards. We're testing this today. Fingers
>> crossed.. if this works, we just might be able to compile PCL on the
>> Gumstix afterwards :)
>>
>> Btw, these changes are only internal, no user should really notice them.

_______________________________________________
[hidden email] / http://pointclouds.org
https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/pcl-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [ros-users] Special Thanksgiving Edition 0.5 of PCL! Standalone PCL released!

Radu B. Rusu
Administrator
Geoff,

If it fits with the new structure of the library, let's go ahead and apply it.

Cheers,
Radu.
--
http://pointclouds.org

On 12/06/2010 11:52 AM, Geoffrey Biggs wrote:

> On 04/12/10 03:43, Jose Gonzalez wrote:
>> Yes, absolutely. Just let me know when the changes are in place
>
> What's the status on this patch? Should I go ahead and apply it, or are
> we waiting for an updated version?
>
> Geoff
>
>>> On Dec 3, 2010 1:40 PM, "Radu Bogdan Rusu"<[hidden email]
>>> <mailto:[hidden email]>>  wrote:
>>>
>>> Jose,
>>>
>>> Would it be ok if I ask you to regenerate the patch in a few hours
>>> (I'll ping you when we're done) ? :)
>>>
>>> Troy proposed an internal cleanup of the library which might lead to
>>> _large_ speedups in compilation time, so the patch would need to be
>>> changed quite a bit afterwards. We're testing this today. Fingers
>>> crossed.. if this works, we just might be able to compile PCL on the
>>> Gumstix afterwards :)
>>>
>>> Btw, these changes are only internal, no user should really notice them.
>
> _______________________________________________
> [hidden email] / http://pointclouds.org
> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/pcl-users
_______________________________________________
[hidden email] / http://pointclouds.org
https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/pcl-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [ros-users] Special Thanksgiving Edition 0.5 of PCL! Standalone PCL released!

Jose Gonzalez
Radu, 

Are the changes you announced completed? Are they in the ROS repository? I can check if the patch works for the head version or change it otherwise

Jose

On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 8:27 PM, Radu Bogdan Rusu <[hidden email]> wrote:
Geoff,

If it fits with the new structure of the library, let's go ahead and apply it.

Cheers,
Radu.
--
http://pointclouds.org

On 12/06/2010 11:52 AM, Geoffrey Biggs wrote:
> On 04/12/10 03:43, Jose Gonzalez wrote:
>> Yes, absolutely. Just let me know when the changes are in place
>
> What's the status on this patch? Should I go ahead and apply it, or are
> we waiting for an updated version?
>
> Geoff
>
>>> On Dec 3, 2010 1:40 PM, "Radu Bogdan Rusu"<[hidden email]
>>> <mailto:[hidden email]>>  wrote:
>>>
>>> Jose,
>>>
>>> Would it be ok if I ask you to regenerate the patch in a few hours
>>> (I'll ping you when we're done) ? :)
>>>
>>> Troy proposed an internal cleanup of the library which might lead to
>>> _large_ speedups in compilation time, so the patch would need to be
>>> changed quite a bit afterwards. We're testing this today. Fingers
>>> crossed.. if this works, we just might be able to compile PCL on the
>>> Gumstix afterwards :)
>>>
>>> Btw, these changes are only internal, no user should really notice them.
>
> _______________________________________________
> [hidden email] / http://pointclouds.org
> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/pcl-users
_______________________________________________
[hidden email] / http://pointclouds.org
https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/pcl-users


_______________________________________________
[hidden email] / http://pointclouds.org
https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/pcl-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [ros-users] Special Thanksgiving Edition 0.5 of PCL! Standalone PCL released!

Radu B. Rusu
Administrator
Jose,

Yes - trunk should have 99% of those changes in for PCL. We haven't really touched PCL_ROS yet. I believe the only thing
left is the pcl::Features library that needs to be restructured.

Cheers,
Radu.
--
http://pointclouds.org

On 12/07/2010 08:35 AM, Jose Gonzalez wrote:

> Radu,
>
> Are the changes you announced completed? Are they in the ROS repository? I can check if the patch works for the head
> version or change it otherwise
>
> Jose
>
> On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 8:27 PM, Radu Bogdan Rusu <[hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
>
>     Geoff,
>
>     If it fits with the new structure of the library, let's go ahead and apply it.
>
>     Cheers,
>     Radu.
>     --
>     http://pointclouds.org
>
>     On 12/06/2010 11:52 AM, Geoffrey Biggs wrote:
>      > On 04/12/10 03:43, Jose Gonzalez wrote:
>      >> Yes, absolutely. Just let me know when the changes are in place
>      >
>      > What's the status on this patch? Should I go ahead and apply it, or are
>      > we waiting for an updated version?
>      >
>      > Geoff
>      >
>      >>> On Dec 3, 2010 1:40 PM, "Radu Bogdan Rusu"<[hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>
>      >>> <mailto:[hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>>>  wrote:
>      >>>
>      >>> Jose,
>      >>>
>      >>> Would it be ok if I ask you to regenerate the patch in a few hours
>      >>> (I'll ping you when we're done) ? :)
>      >>>
>      >>> Troy proposed an internal cleanup of the library which might lead to
>      >>> _large_ speedups in compilation time, so the patch would need to be
>      >>> changed quite a bit afterwards. We're testing this today. Fingers
>      >>> crossed.. if this works, we just might be able to compile PCL on the
>      >>> Gumstix afterwards :)
>      >>>
>      >>> Btw, these changes are only internal, no user should really notice them.
>      >
>      > _______________________________________________
>      > [hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]> / http://pointclouds.org
>      > https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/pcl-users
>     _______________________________________________
>     [hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]> / http://pointclouds.org
>     https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/pcl-users
>
>
_______________________________________________
[hidden email] / http://pointclouds.org
https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/pcl-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [ros-users] Special Thanksgiving Edition 0.5 of PCL! Standalone PCL released!

Geoffrey Biggs
In reply to this post by Jose Gonzalez
Hi Jose,

I've taken a look at the patch. Unfortunately, it installs several files
that have moved (mainly the .hpp files from src/ that had the template
implementations). Do you have time to update it?

Geoff

On 08/12/10 01:35, Jose Gonzalez wrote:

> Radu,
>
> Are the changes you announced completed? Are they in the ROS repository?
> I can check if the patch works for the head version or change it otherwise
>
> Jose
>
> On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 8:27 PM, Radu Bogdan Rusu <[hidden email]
> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
>
>     Geoff,
>
>     If it fits with the new structure of the library, let's go ahead and
>     apply it.
>
>     Cheers,
>     Radu.
>     --
>     http://pointclouds.org
>
>     On 12/06/2010 11:52 AM, Geoffrey Biggs wrote:
>     > On 04/12/10 03:43, Jose Gonzalez wrote:
>     >> Yes, absolutely. Just let me know when the changes are in place
>     >
>     > What's the status on this patch? Should I go ahead and apply it,
>     or are
>     > we waiting for an updated version?
>     >
>     > Geoff
>     >
>     >>> On Dec 3, 2010 1:40 PM, "Radu Bogdan Rusu"<[hidden email]
>     <mailto:[hidden email]>
>     >>> <mailto:[hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>>>
>      wrote:
>     >>>
>     >>> Jose,
>     >>>
>     >>> Would it be ok if I ask you to regenerate the patch in a few hours
>     >>> (I'll ping you when we're done) ? :)
>     >>>
>     >>> Troy proposed an internal cleanup of the library which might lead to
>     >>> _large_ speedups in compilation time, so the patch would need to be
>     >>> changed quite a bit afterwards. We're testing this today. Fingers
>     >>> crossed.. if this works, we just might be able to compile PCL on the
>     >>> Gumstix afterwards :)
>     >>>
>     >>> Btw, these changes are only internal, no user should really
>     notice them.
>     >
>     > _______________________________________________
>     > [hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]> /
>     http://pointclouds.org
>     > https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/pcl-users
>     _______________________________________________
>     [hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]> /
>     http://pointclouds.org
>     https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/pcl-users
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> [hidden email] / http://pointclouds.org
> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/pcl-users
_______________________________________________
[hidden email] / http://pointclouds.org
https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/pcl-users